Demographics details for Gardena, CA vs Central city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gardena, CA vs Central city, KY.

Data Gardena Central city
Population 58,843 5,810
Median Age 40.1 years 33.5 years
Median Income $75,443 $52,184
Married Families 37.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 16%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Gardena vs Central city

  • In Gardena, the population is higher at 58,843, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
  • Residents in Gardena have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
  • Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gardena.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 15% in Gardena.
  • The unemployment rate in Gardena is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.

Demographics

Demographics Gardena vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gardena Central city
Black 20 3
White -5 88
Asian 25 Data is updating
Hispanic 44 2
Two or More Races 15 6
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Gardena vs Central city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardena at 20% compared to 3% in Central city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to -5% in Gardena.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gardena at 25% compared to 0% in Central city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Gardena at 44% compared to 2% in Central city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gardena at 15% compared to 6% in Central city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gardena and Central city at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gardena Central city
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 15.5%
Depression 13.8% 26.8%
Smoking 11.3% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 13.5% 14.8%
Obesity 28.1% 41.9%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gardena vs Central city

  • In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 13.8% in Gardena.
  • Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 14.8% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
  • Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gardena Central city
No Schooling 3.0% (1,776) 1.1% (65)
High School Diploma 15.0% (8,829) 15.4% (897)
Less than High School 26.5% (15,605) 15.6% (905)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.8% (11,669) 8.3% (480)

Education Levels Comparison: Gardena vs Central city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gardena have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.1% in Central city.
  • In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
  • More residents in Gardena have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 15.6% in Central city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gardena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.