Demographics details for Gardena, CA vs Belt, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gardena, CA vs Belt, MT.
| Data | Gardena | Belt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,843 | 522 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $75,443 | $65,500 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gardena vs Belt
- In Gardena, the population is higher at 58,843, compared to 522 in Belt.
- The median age in Belt is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 40.1 years in Gardena.
- Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443 compared to $65,500 in Belt.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Gardena and Belt at 37.0%.
- Gardena has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Belt.
- The unemployment rate in Gardena is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Belt.
Demographics
Demographics Gardena vs Belt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gardena | Belt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | Data is updating |
| White | -5 | 88 |
| Asian | 25 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 44 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gardena vs Belt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gardena at 20% compared to 0% in Belt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Belt at 88% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- The Asian population is larger in Gardena at 25% compared to 0% in Belt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gardena at 44% compared to 10% in Belt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gardena at 15% compared to 2% in Belt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gardena at 1% compared to 0% in Belt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gardena | Belt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 13.8% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 28.1% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gardena vs Belt
- In Belt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Belt at 23.8% versus 13.8% in Gardena.
- Belt has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Belt at 23.0% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
- Belt has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Belt at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gardena | Belt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (1,776) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (8,829) | 22.4% (117) |
| Less than High School | 26.5% (15,605) | 16.5% (86) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (11,669) | 13.2% (69) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gardena vs Belt
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardena have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Belt.
- In Belt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- More residents in Gardena have less than a high school education at 26.5% compared to 16.5% in Belt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gardena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 13.2% in Belt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.