Demographics details for Garden city, MN vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garden city, MN vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Garden city | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 221 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 44.3 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $74,063 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Garden city vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 221 in Garden city.
- Residents in Garden city have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Garden city has a higher median income of $74,063 compared to $66,418 in Shafter.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garden city at 49.0% compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- The poverty level is higher in Shafter at 20%, compared to 0% in Garden city.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Garden city.
Demographics
Demographics Garden city vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garden city | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 97 | -9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Garden city vs Shafter
- In Shafter, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- In Shafter, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Garden city.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 1% in Garden city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 2% in Garden city.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Garden city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garden city | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garden city vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.2% in Garden city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garden city at 23.6% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in Garden city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garden city at 22.7% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Shafter has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 33.7% in Garden city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Garden city at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garden city | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (44) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (14) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (24) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garden city vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Garden city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 14.1% in Shafter.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 6.3% in Garden city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.