Demographics details for Garden city, MI vs Sulphur, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garden city, MI vs Sulphur, LA.
Data | Garden city | Sulphur |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,815 | 20,342 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $63,630 | $53,606 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Garden city vs Sulphur
- In Garden city, the population is higher at 26,815, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Garden city have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Garden city has a higher median income of $63,630 compared to $53,606 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garden city at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 15%, compared to 12% in Garden city.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Garden city and Sulphur at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Garden city vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Garden city | Sulphur |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 9 |
White | 82 | 83 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garden city vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Garden city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur at 83% compared to 82% in Garden city.
- Both Garden city and Sulphur have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Garden city and Sulphur at 5%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garden city at 6% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garden city and Sulphur at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Garden city | Sulphur |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.4% |
Depression | 25.2% | 28.7% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 20.6% |
Obesity | 32.1% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garden city vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.7% in Garden city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 28.7% versus 25.2% in Garden city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garden city at 21.5% compared to 21.3% in Sulphur.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 19.7% in Garden city.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 32.1% in Garden city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Garden city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Garden city | Sulphur |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (294) | 0.5% (93) |
High School Diploma | 22.7% (6,076) | 24.2% (4,925) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (3,455) | 19.3% (3,918) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,739) | 11.7% (2,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garden city vs Sulphur
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Sulphur.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 22.7% in Garden city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 19.3%, compared to 12.9% in Garden city.
- In Sulphur, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 10.2% in Garden city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.