Demographics details for Garden city, MI vs Seattle, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garden city, MI vs Seattle, WA.
| Data | Garden city | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,815 | 749,256 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,630 | $116,068 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Garden city vs Seattle
- The population in Seattle is higher at 749,256, compared to 26,815 in Garden city.
- Residents in Garden city have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 35.4 years in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068, compared to $63,630 in Garden city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garden city at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Seattle.
- Garden city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.2% in Garden city.
Demographics
Demographics Garden city vs Seattle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garden city | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 7 |
| White | 82 | 59 |
| Asian | 1 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Garden city vs Seattle
- In Seattle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 59% in Seattle.
- In Seattle, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 1% in Garden city.
- Seattle has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Garden city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seattle at 9%, compared to 6% in Garden city.
- In Seattle, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Garden city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garden city | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 23.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garden city vs Seattle
- More residents in Garden city report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.1% in Seattle.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garden city at 25.2% compared to 23.6% in Seattle.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garden city at 21.5% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garden city at 19.7% compared to 17.6% in Seattle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Garden city at 32.1% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
- Disability percentages are higher in Garden city at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garden city | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (294) | 0.9% (6,839) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (6,076) | 5.8% (43,106) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,455) | 4.7% (35,004) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,739) | 49.4% (369,798) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garden city vs Seattle
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Seattle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
- More residents in Garden city have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
- In Seattle, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 10.2% in Garden city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.