Demographics details for Garden city, MI vs Rialto, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garden city, MI vs Rialto, CA.
| Data | Garden city | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,815 | 103,545 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $63,630 | $80,750 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Garden city vs Rialto
- The population in Rialto is higher at 103,545, compared to 26,815 in Garden city.
- Residents in Garden city have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750, compared to $63,630 in Garden city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garden city at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- The poverty level is higher in Rialto at 18%, compared to 12% in Garden city.
- Rialto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in Garden city.
Demographics
Demographics Garden city vs Rialto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garden city | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 12 |
| White | 82 | -7 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Garden city vs Rialto
- In Rialto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 6% in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- In Rialto, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Garden city.
- Rialto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 5% in Garden city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rialto at 17%, compared to 6% in Garden city.
- In Rialto, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Garden city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garden city | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garden city vs Rialto
- More residents in Garden city report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garden city at 25.2% compared to 17.5% in Rialto.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garden city at 21.5% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garden city at 19.7% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Rialto has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 32.1% in Garden city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Garden city at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garden city | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (294) | 2.7% (2,754) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (6,076) | 18.6% (19,301) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,455) | 30.0% (31,028) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,739) | 7.5% (7,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garden city vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.1% in Garden city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rialto at 30.0%, compared to 12.9% in Garden city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.