Demographics details for Garden city, MI vs Earlham, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garden city, MI vs Earlham, IA.
| Data | Garden city | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,815 | 1,423 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,630 | $103,977 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Garden city vs Earlham
- In Garden city, the population is higher at 26,815, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Earlham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 40.9 years in Garden city.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977, compared to $63,630 in Garden city.
- In Earlham, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Earlham.
- The unemployment rate in Garden city is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Garden city vs Earlham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garden city | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 2 |
| White | 82 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garden city vs Earlham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Garden city at 6% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlham at 95% compared to 82% in Garden city.
- The Asian population is larger in Garden city at 1% compared to 0% in Earlham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garden city at 5% compared to 1% in Earlham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garden city at 6% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garden city and Earlham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garden city | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garden city vs Earlham
- More residents in Garden city report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garden city at 25.2% compared to 18.4% in Earlham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garden city at 21.5% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 19.7% in Garden city.
- Earlham has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 32.1% in Garden city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Garden city at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garden city | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (294) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (6,076) | 13.8% (197) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,455) | 6.0% (85) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,739) | 17.0% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garden city vs Earlham
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- More residents in Garden city have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- In Earlham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 10.2% in Garden city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.