Demographics details for Garden city, KS vs Shelbina, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garden city, KS vs Shelbina, MO.
| Data | Garden city | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,519 | 1,582 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $67,500 | $52,050 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Garden city vs Shelbina
- In Garden city, the population is higher at 27,519, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- The median age in Shelbina is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 32.3 years in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher median income of $67,500 compared to $52,050 in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 37.0% in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Shelbina.
- Shelbina has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Garden city.
Demographics
Demographics Garden city vs Shelbina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garden city | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 16 | 89 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 55 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Garden city vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Garden city at 6% compared to 5% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbina at 89% compared to 16% in Garden city.
- The Asian population is larger in Garden city at 5% compared to 0% in Shelbina.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garden city at 55% compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garden city at 18% compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Garden city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garden city | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 23.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garden city vs Shelbina
- In Shelbina, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.3% in Garden city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbina at 26.4% versus 18.2% in Garden city.
- Shelbina has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 18.5% in Garden city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garden city at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- Shelbina has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 38.7% in Garden city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Garden city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garden city | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.5% (967) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 10.9% (2,993) | 31.1% (492) |
| Less than High School | 34.9% (9,615) | 17.6% (279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (3,034) | 14.2% (225) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garden city vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of residents in Garden city have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.1% compared to 10.9% in Garden city.
- More residents in Garden city have less than a high school education at 34.9% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 11.0% in Garden city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.