Demographics details for Galveston, TX vs Stockholm, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Galveston, TX vs Stockholm, WI.
Data | Galveston | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,089 | 82 |
Median Age | 39.4 years | 69.8 years |
Median Income | $57,453 | $62,500 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 84.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Galveston vs Stockholm
- In Galveston, the population is higher at 53,089, compared to 82 in Stockholm.
- The median age in Stockholm is higher at 69.8 years, compared to 39.4 years in Galveston.
- Stockholm has a higher median income of $62,500, compared to $57,453 in Galveston.
- In Stockholm, the percentage of married families is higher at 84.0%, compared to 34.0% in Galveston.
- Galveston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The unemployment rate in Galveston is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.5% in Stockholm.
Demographics
Demographics Galveston vs Stockholm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Galveston | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | Data is updating |
White | 37 | 100 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 30 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Galveston vs Stockholm
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Galveston at 16% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stockholm at 100% compared to 37% in Galveston.
- The Asian population is larger in Galveston at 3% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Galveston at 30% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Galveston at 13% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Galveston at 1% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Galveston | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 11.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.6% |
Depression | 21.7% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Galveston vs Stockholm
- More residents in Galveston report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 11.8% in Stockholm.
- Depression is more prevalent in Galveston at 21.7% compared to 20.6% in Stockholm.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Galveston at 16.9% compared to 16.4% in Stockholm.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stockholm at 19.3% compared to 16.8% in Galveston.
- Stockholm has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 37.4% in Galveston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stockholm at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Galveston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Galveston | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (823) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (7,336) | 28.0% (23) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (8,791) | 2.4% (2) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (12,311) | 64.6% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Galveston vs Stockholm
- A higher percentage of residents in Galveston have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
- More residents in Galveston have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 2.4% in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 64.6% compared to 23.2% in Galveston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.