Demographics details for Galveston, TX vs Red river, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Galveston, TX vs Red river, NM.
Data | Galveston | Red river |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,089 | 539 |
Median Age | 39.4 years | 43.3 years |
Median Income | $57,453 | $49,479 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Galveston vs Red river
- In Galveston, the population is higher at 53,089, compared to 539 in Red river.
- The median age in Red river is higher at 43.3 years, compared to 39.4 years in Galveston.
- Galveston has a higher median income of $57,453 compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Galveston at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- Galveston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Red river.
- The unemployment rate in Galveston is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.2% in Red river.
Demographics
Demographics Galveston vs Red river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Galveston | Red river |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | Data is updating |
White | 37 | 89 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 30 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Galveston vs Red river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Galveston at 16% compared to 0% in Red river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red river at 89% compared to 37% in Galveston.
- The Asian population is larger in Galveston at 3% compared to 0% in Red river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Galveston at 30% compared to 9% in Red river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Galveston at 13% compared to 2% in Red river.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Galveston at 1% compared to 0% in Red river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Galveston | Red river |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.4% |
Depression | 21.7% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 27.1% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Galveston vs Red river
- More residents in Galveston report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.2% in Red river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Red river at 22.0% versus 21.7% in Galveston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Galveston at 16.9% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Red river at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in Galveston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Galveston at 37.4% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Red river at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Galveston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Galveston | Red river |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (823) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (7,336) | 5.9% (32) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (8,791) | 6.7% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (12,311) | 26.2% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Galveston vs Red river
- A higher percentage of residents in Galveston have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Galveston hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- More residents in Galveston have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 6.7% in Red river.
- In Red river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 23.2% in Galveston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.