Demographics details for Galveston, TX vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Galveston, TX vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Galveston | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,089 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,453 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Galveston vs Loves park
- In Galveston, the population is higher at 53,089, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Galveston have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Galveston has a higher median income of $57,453 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Galveston.
- Galveston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The unemployment rate in Galveston is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Galveston vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Galveston | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 7 |
| White | 37 | 71 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Galveston vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Galveston at 16% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 37% in Galveston.
- Both Galveston and Loves park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Galveston at 30% compared to 10% in Loves park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Galveston at 13% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Galveston at 1% compared to 0% in Loves park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Galveston | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Galveston vs Loves park
- More residents in Galveston report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Galveston at 21.7% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 16.8% in Galveston.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 37.4% in Galveston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Galveston at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Galveston | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (823) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (7,336) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 16.6% (8,791) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (12,311) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Galveston vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Galveston have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
- More residents in Galveston have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Galveston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.