Demographics details for Galveston, TX vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Galveston, TX vs Federal way, WA.
| Data | Galveston | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,089 | 97,863 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,453 | $80,360 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Galveston vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 53,089 in Galveston.
- Residents in Galveston have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $57,453 in Galveston.
- In Federal way, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Galveston.
- Galveston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.6% in Galveston.
Demographics
Demographics Galveston vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Galveston | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 17 |
| White | 37 | 34 |
| Asian | 3 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Galveston vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 16% in Galveston.
- Galveston has a higher percentage of White residents at 37% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 3% in Galveston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Galveston at 30% compared to 19% in Federal way.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 13% in Galveston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Galveston and Federal way at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Galveston | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Galveston vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 21.7% in Galveston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Galveston at 16.9% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- Binge drinking is more common in Galveston at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Obesity rates are higher in Galveston at 37.4% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- Disability percentages are higher in Galveston at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Galveston | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (823) | 1.8% (1,735) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (7,336) | 15.3% (15,003) |
| Less than High School | 16.6% (8,791) | 11.0% (10,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (12,311) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Galveston vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Galveston.
- In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
- More residents in Galveston have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of residents in Galveston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.