Demographics details for Gallup, NM vs Little falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallup, NM vs Little falls, MN.
| Data | Gallup | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,932 | 9,094 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $58,358 | $44,455 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Gallup vs Little falls
- In Gallup, the population is higher at 20,932, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
- The median age in Little falls is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 34.1 years in Gallup.
- Gallup has a higher median income of $58,358 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
- In Little falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Gallup.
- Gallup has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 11% in Little falls.
- The unemployment rate in Gallup is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.2% in Little falls.
Demographics
Demographics Gallup vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallup | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 1 | 95 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
| American Indian | 51 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallup vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallup at 2% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 1% in Gallup.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallup at 4% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallup at 33% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallup at 9% compared to 3% in Little falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gallup at 51% compared to 0% in Little falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallup | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallup vs Little falls
- More residents in Gallup report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 18.5% in Gallup.
- Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 18.6% in Gallup.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 12.9% in Gallup.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallup at 39.4% compared to 38.5% in Little falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Gallup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallup | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (152) | 0.7% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (3,703) | 25.4% (2,308) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (2,501) | 11.7% (1,063) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (3,119) | 14.3% (1,301) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallup vs Little falls
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Gallup and Little falls at 0.7%.
- In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 17.7% in Gallup.
- More residents in Gallup have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallup hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.