Demographics details for Gallup, NM vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallup, NM vs Lawrence, KS.
| Data | Gallup | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,932 | 95,794 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $58,358 | $59,834 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Gallup vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 95,794, compared to 20,932 in Gallup.
- Residents in Gallup have a higher median age of 34.1 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $59,834, compared to $58,358 in Gallup.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 28.0% in Gallup.
- Gallup has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Lawrence.
- The unemployment rate in Gallup is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Gallup vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallup | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 1 | 71 |
| Asian | 4 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | 51 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Gallup vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Gallup.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lawrence at 71% compared to 1% in Gallup.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Gallup.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallup at 33% compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- Both Gallup and Lawrence have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gallup at 51% compared to 2% in Lawrence.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallup | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallup vs Lawrence
- More residents in Gallup report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.5% in Lawrence.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lawrence at 22.3% versus 18.5% in Gallup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallup at 18.6% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 12.9% in Gallup.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallup at 39.4% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gallup at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallup | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (152) | 0.5% (466) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (3,703) | 8.2% (7,882) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (2,501) | 4.0% (3,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (3,119) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallup vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallup have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallup hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Gallup have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 14.9% in Gallup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.