Demographics details for Gallitzin, PA vs Hurley, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallitzin, PA vs Hurley, VA.
Data | Gallitzin | Hurley |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,508 | 181 |
Median Age | 39.4 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $52,500 | $45,000 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Gallitzin vs Hurley
- In Gallitzin, the population is higher at 1,508, compared to 181 in Hurley.
- Residents in Gallitzin have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 35.0 years in Hurley.
- Gallitzin has a higher median income of $52,500 compared to $45,000 in Hurley.
- In Hurley, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 32.0% in Gallitzin.
- The poverty level is higher in Hurley at 15%, compared to 12% in Gallitzin.
- The unemployment rate in Gallitzin is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.0% in Hurley.
Demographics
Demographics Gallitzin vs Hurley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gallitzin | Hurley |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 93 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallitzin vs Hurley
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gallitzin and Hurley at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hurley at 100% compared to 93% in Gallitzin.
- Both Gallitzin and Hurley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallitzin at 3% compared to 0% in Hurley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallitzin at 4% compared to 0% in Hurley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallitzin and Hurley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gallitzin | Hurley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.9% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 38.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallitzin vs Hurley
- More residents in Gallitzin report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallitzin at 25.2% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallitzin at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gallitzin at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallitzin at 38.6% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gallitzin at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gallitzin | Hurley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (16) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 29.8% (449) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 20.6% (310) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (150) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallitzin vs Hurley
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallitzin have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallitzin hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- More residents in Gallitzin have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallitzin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Hurley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.