Demographics details for Gallitzin, PA vs Cowden, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallitzin, PA vs Cowden, IL.
| Data | Gallitzin | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,508 | 507 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $52,500 | $43,750 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Gallitzin vs Cowden
- In Gallitzin, the population is higher at 1,508, compared to 507 in Cowden.
- Residents in Gallitzin have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 30.9 years in Cowden.
- Gallitzin has a higher median income of $52,500 compared to $43,750 in Cowden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallitzin at 32.0% compared to 29.0% in Cowden.
- Gallitzin has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Cowden.
- The unemployment rate in Gallitzin is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Cowden.
Demographics
Demographics Gallitzin vs Cowden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallitzin | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 93 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gallitzin vs Cowden
- In Cowden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
- Gallitzin has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 89% in Cowden.
- Both Gallitzin and Cowden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Cowden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Gallitzin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallitzin at 4% compared to 3% in Cowden.
- In Cowden, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallitzin | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 20.9% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallitzin vs Cowden
- More residents in Gallitzin report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.0% in Cowden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallitzin at 25.2% compared to 22.3% in Cowden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallitzin at 20.9% compared to 19.5% in Cowden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gallitzin at 18.5% compared to 18.2% in Cowden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallitzin at 38.6% compared to 36.5% in Cowden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gallitzin at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Cowden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallitzin | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (16) | 0.6% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (449) | 22.5% (114) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (310) | 5.7% (29) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (150) | 6.9% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallitzin vs Cowden
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallitzin have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Cowden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallitzin hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 22.5% in Cowden.
- More residents in Gallitzin have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 5.7% in Cowden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallitzin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.9% compared to 6.9% in Cowden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.