Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Stuttgart, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Stuttgart, AR.
| Data | Gallatin | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 7,907 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $59,124 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Stuttgart
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
- The median age is the same in both Gallatin and Stuttgart at 37.8 years.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $59,124 in Stuttgart.
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- Stuttgart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 42 |
| White | 67 | 53 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 0% in Stuttgart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Stuttgart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 24.4% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.8% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 25.5% (2,015) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 14.5% (1,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 12.0% (948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Stuttgart
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Stuttgart.
- In Stuttgart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stuttgart at 14.5%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.