Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Springhill, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Springhill, LA.
| Data | Gallatin | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 4,575 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 46.1 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $27,868 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Springhill
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 4,575 in Springhill.
- The median age in Springhill is higher at 46.1 years, compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallatin at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Springhill.
- The poverty level is higher in Springhill at 20%, compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- Springhill has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Springhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 34 |
| White | 67 | 55 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Springhill
- In Springhill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 55% in Springhill.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 0% in Springhill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 8% in Springhill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 2% in Springhill.
- In Springhill, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 23.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 18.7% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 31.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Springhill
- In Springhill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springhill at 29.9% versus 27.7% in Gallatin.
- Springhill has a higher smoking rate at 31.4% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Springhill at 15.2% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Springhill has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 2.3% (104) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 22.5% (1,028) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 24.5% (1,122) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 6.1% (277) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Springhill
- In Springhill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.2% in Gallatin.
- In Springhill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springhill at 24.5%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.