Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Southington, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Southington, CT.

Data Gallatin Southington
Population 48,194 43,807
Median Age 37.8 years Data is updating
Median Income $68,548 $Data is updating
Married Families 37.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level 13% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.3 2.2

Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Southington

  • In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 43,807 in Southington.
  • Residents in Gallatin have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 0.0 years in Southington.
  • Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $0 in Southington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallatin at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The unemployment rate in Gallatin is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.2% in Southington.

Demographics

Demographics Gallatin vs Southington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gallatin Southington
Black 15 Data is updating
White 67 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 9 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Southington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Southington at 100% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Southington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gallatin Southington
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% Data is updating%
Depression 27.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Southington

  • More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gallatin Southington
No Schooling 1.2% (596) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.9% (6,695) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.6% (5,600) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (9,464) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Southington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • More residents in Gallatin have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Southington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.