Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Navajo dam, NM.
| Data | Gallatin | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 330 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $63,375 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Navajo dam
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Gallatin have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallatin at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Navajo dam at 14%, compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- Navajo dam has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | Data is updating |
| White | 67 | 16 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Navajo dam at 11%, compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 32.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Navajo dam
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 4.8% (16) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 6.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Gallatin have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.