Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Mullica hill, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Mullica hill, NJ.
| Data | Gallatin | Mullica hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 4,454 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $123,265 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Mullica hill
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 4,454 in Mullica hill.
- The median age in Mullica hill is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265, compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- In Mullica hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- The unemployment rate in Gallatin is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Mullica hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Mullica hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 11 |
| White | 67 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Mullica hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 11% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mullica hill at 74% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Mullica hill, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Gallatin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- Both Gallatin and Mullica hill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Mullica hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Mullica hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 10.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 27.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Mullica hill
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 20.9% in Mullica hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mullica hill at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Mullica hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.7% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 12.9% (576) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 5.5% (244) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 36.2% (1,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Mullica hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
- More residents in Gallatin have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- In Mullica hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.