Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Litchfield, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Litchfield, ME.
| Data | Gallatin | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 3,642 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Litchfield
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 3,642 in Litchfield.
- The median age in Litchfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Litchfield has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- In Litchfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Litchfield.
- The unemployment rate in Gallatin is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.5% in Litchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Litchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 67 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Litchfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield at 96% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Litchfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 27.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Litchfield
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Litchfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- More residents in Gallatin have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.