Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Klickitat, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Klickitat, WA.
| Data | Gallatin | Klickitat |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 23,271 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 47.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $66,581 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Klickitat
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 23,271 in Klickitat.
- The median age in Klickitat is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $66,581 in Klickitat.
- In Klickitat, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Klickitat.
- Klickitat has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Klickitat provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Klickitat |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 67 | 77 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Klickitat
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 1% in Klickitat.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Klickitat at 77% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 1% in Klickitat.
- Klickitat has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klickitat at 8%, compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- In Klickitat, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Klickitat |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 30.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Klickitat
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.6% in Klickitat.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 25.6% in Klickitat.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 15.5% in Klickitat.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Klickitat at 18.7% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 30.7% in Klickitat.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klickitat at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Klickitat |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 1.0% (223) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 16.1% (3,753) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 15.2% (3,532) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 22.7% (5,271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Klickitat
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Klickitat.
- In Klickitat, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klickitat at 15.2%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Klickitat, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.