Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Jackson, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Jackson, MI.
| Data | Gallatin | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 31,031 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $41,988 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 7.9 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Jackson
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 31,031 in Jackson.
- Residents in Gallatin have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallatin at 37.0% compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
- The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 21%, compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 7.9% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 21 |
| White | 67 | 62 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Jackson
- In Jackson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 62% in Jackson.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 1% in Jackson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 6% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jackson at 10%, compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Jackson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 26.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jackson at 14.9% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Jackson has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jackson at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.5% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 21.1% (6,548) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 14.2% (4,397) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 10.1% (3,126) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- In Jackson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jackson at 14.2%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 10.1% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.