Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Horn lake, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Horn lake, MS.
| Data | Gallatin | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 26,550 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $57,111 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Horn lake
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 26,550 in Horn lake.
- Residents in Gallatin have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 35.5 years in Horn lake.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $57,111 in Horn lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallatin at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Horn lake.
- The poverty level is higher in Horn lake at 19%, compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- Horn lake has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Horn lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 45 |
| White | 67 | 40 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Horn lake
- In Horn lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 40% in Horn lake.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 1% in Horn lake.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Gallatin and Horn lake at 9%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 5% in Horn lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Horn lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 43.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Horn lake
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in Horn lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 23.5% in Horn lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 20.4% in Horn lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 12.9% in Horn lake.
- Horn lake has higher obesity rates at 43.4% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Horn lake at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.9% (252) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 18.1% (4,818) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 16.3% (4,319) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 10.5% (2,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Horn lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Horn lake.
- In Horn lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Horn lake at 16.3%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 10.5% in Horn lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.