Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Columbiana, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Columbiana, OH.
| Data | Gallatin | Columbiana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 100,511 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $55,473 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Columbiana
- The population in Columbiana is higher at 100,511, compared to 48,194 in Gallatin.
- The median age in Columbiana is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $55,473 in Columbiana.
- In Columbiana, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Columbiana.
- Columbiana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Columbiana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Columbiana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 2 |
| White | 67 | 93 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Columbiana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 2% in Columbiana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Columbiana at 93% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 0% in Columbiana.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 2% in Columbiana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 3% in Columbiana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Columbiana at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Columbiana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 22.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 45.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Columbiana
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Columbiana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 23.8% in Columbiana.
- Columbiana has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Columbiana at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Columbiana has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbiana at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Columbiana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 1.0% (1,010) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 29.8% (29,903) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 14.3% (14,400) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 12.1% (12,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Columbiana
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Columbiana.
- In Columbiana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbiana at 14.3%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 12.1% in Columbiana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.