Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Christmas valley, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Christmas valley, OR.

Data Gallatin Christmas valley
Population 48,194 1,313
Median Age 37.8 years 47.0 years
Median Income $68,548 $46,900
Married Families 37.0% 64.0%
Poverty Level 13% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 6.5

Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Christmas valley

  • In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 1,313 in Christmas valley.
  • The median age in Christmas valley is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
  • Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $46,900 in Christmas valley.
  • In Christmas valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
  • The poverty level is higher in Christmas valley at 15%, compared to 13% in Gallatin.
  • Christmas valley has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.

Demographics

Demographics Gallatin vs Christmas valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gallatin Christmas valley
Black 15 1
White 67 94
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 9 2
Two or More Races 7 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Christmas valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 1% in Christmas valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Christmas valley at 94% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 1% in Christmas valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 2% in Christmas valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 2% in Christmas valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Christmas valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gallatin Christmas valley
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% Data is updating%
Depression 27.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Christmas valley

  • More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gallatin Christmas valley
No Schooling 1.2% (596) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.9% (6,695) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.6% (5,600) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (9,464) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Christmas valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • More residents in Gallatin have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.