Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Avon by the sea, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Avon by the sea, NJ.
Data | Gallatin | Avon by the sea |
---|---|---|
Population | 48,194 | 1,940 |
Median Age | 37.8 years | 56.2 years |
Median Income | $68,548 | $106,563 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Avon by the sea
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 1,940 in Avon by the sea.
- The median age in Avon by the sea is higher at 56.2 years, compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Avon by the sea has a higher median income of $106,563, compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- In Avon by the sea, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Avon by the sea.
- Avon by the sea has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Avon by the sea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gallatin | Avon by the sea |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 1 |
White | 67 | 88 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Avon by the sea
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 1% in Avon by the sea.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Avon by the sea at 88% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- The Asian population is larger in Gallatin at 2% compared to 1% in Avon by the sea.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gallatin at 9% compared to 6% in Avon by the sea.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gallatin at 7% compared to 4% in Avon by the sea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Avon by the sea at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gallatin | Avon by the sea |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 7.7% |
Depression | 27.7% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 20.8% | 9.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Avon by the sea
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in Avon by the sea.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 20.3% in Avon by the sea.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 9.9% in Avon by the sea.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Avon by the sea at 19.5% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 25.6% in Avon by the sea.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Avon by the sea.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gallatin | Avon by the sea |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.3% (6) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 9.7% (188) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 3.5% (67) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 52.3% (1,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Avon by the sea
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Avon by the sea.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 9.7% in Avon by the sea.
- More residents in Gallatin have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 3.5% in Avon by the sea.
- In Avon by the sea, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.3% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.