Demographics details for Galena, IL vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Galena, IL vs Live oak, FL.
Data | Galena | Live oak |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,254 | 7,034 |
Median Age | 59.7 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $52,734 | $43,664 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Galena vs Live oak
- The population in Live oak is higher at 7,034, compared to 3,254 in Galena.
- Residents in Galena have a higher median age of 59.7 years compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Galena has a higher median income of $52,734 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Galena at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 5% in Galena.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.0% in Galena.
Demographics
Demographics Galena vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Galena | Live oak |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 38 |
White | 97 | 41 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Galena vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Galena.
- Galena has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- Both Galena and Live oak have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Galena.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 0% in Galena.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Galena and Live oak at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Galena | Live oak |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 12.4% |
Depression | 20.9% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Galena vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Galena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Galena at 20.9% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 15.3% in Galena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Galena at 18.4% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Live oak has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 35.2% in Galena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Galena at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Galena | Live oak |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (147) |
High School Diploma | 22.8% (741) | 25.0% (1,755) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (200) | 11.3% (796) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.0% (911) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Galena vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Galena.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 22.8% in Galena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Live oak at 11.3%, compared to 6.1% in Galena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Galena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.0% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.