Demographics details for Galatia, IL vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Galatia, IL vs Federal way, WA.
Data | Galatia | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Population | 799 | 97,863 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $46,875 | $80,360 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Galatia vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 799 in Galatia.
- Residents in Galatia have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $46,875 in Galatia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Galatia at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
- Galatia has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.3% in Galatia.
Demographics
Demographics Galatia vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Galatia | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 17 |
White | 94 | 34 |
Asian | Data is updating | 15 |
Hispanic | 1 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Galatia vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Galatia.
- Galatia has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Galatia.
- Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 1% in Galatia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 5% in Galatia.
- In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Galatia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Galatia | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.9% |
Depression | 23.3% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Galatia vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Galatia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 23.3% in Galatia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Galatia at 18.4% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- Binge drinking is more common in Galatia at 18.0% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Obesity rates are higher in Galatia at 36.8% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- Disability percentages are higher in Galatia at 30.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Galatia | Federal way |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (1,735) |
High School Diploma | 23.7% (189) | 15.3% (15,003) |
Less than High School | 10.5% (84) | 11.0% (10,805) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (72) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Galatia vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Galatia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Galatia hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 10.5% in Galatia.
- In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 9.0% in Galatia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.