Demographics details for Gainesville, FL vs Shelbina, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gainesville, FL vs Shelbina, MO.

Data Gainesville Shelbina
Population 145,214 1,582
Median Age 26.0 years 37.6 years
Median Income $43,783 $52,050
Married Families 21.0% 51.0%
Poverty Level 20% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Gainesville vs Shelbina

  • In Gainesville, the population is higher at 145,214, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
  • The median age in Shelbina is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 26.0 years in Gainesville.
  • Shelbina has a higher median income of $52,050, compared to $43,783 in Gainesville.
  • In Shelbina, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 21.0% in Gainesville.
  • Gainesville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 11% in Shelbina.
  • The unemployment rate in Gainesville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Shelbina.

Demographics

Demographics Gainesville vs Shelbina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gainesville Shelbina
Black 21 5
White 53 89
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 3
Two or More Races 8 1
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Gainesville vs Shelbina

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gainesville at 21% compared to 5% in Shelbina.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbina at 89% compared to 53% in Gainesville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gainesville at 6% compared to 0% in Shelbina.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Gainesville at 12% compared to 3% in Shelbina.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gainesville at 8% compared to 1% in Shelbina.
  • In Shelbina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Gainesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gainesville Shelbina
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 14.0%
Depression 18.9% 26.4%
Smoking 18.3% 23.4%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 17.6%
Obesity 33.1% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gainesville vs Shelbina

  • In Shelbina, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Gainesville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbina at 26.4% versus 18.9% in Gainesville.
  • Shelbina has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 18.3% in Gainesville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Shelbina at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Gainesville.
  • Shelbina has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 33.1% in Gainesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Gainesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gainesville Shelbina
No Schooling 0.8% (1,117) 0.2% (3)
High School Diploma 7.5% (10,893) 31.1% (492)
Less than High School 4.7% (6,845) 17.6% (279)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.5% (37,008) 14.2% (225)

Education Levels Comparison: Gainesville vs Shelbina

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gainesville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
  • In Shelbina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.1% compared to 7.5% in Gainesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbina at 17.6%, compared to 4.7% in Gainesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gainesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.5% compared to 14.2% in Shelbina.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.