Demographics details for Gadsden, AL vs Syracuse, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gadsden, AL vs Syracuse, NY.
| Data | Gadsden | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,335 | 144,451 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 31.9 years |
| Median Income | $39,696 | $43,584 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Gadsden vs Syracuse
- The population in Syracuse is higher at 144,451, compared to 33,335 in Gadsden.
- Residents in Gadsden have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 31.9 years in Syracuse.
- Syracuse has a higher median income of $43,584, compared to $39,696 in Gadsden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gadsden at 27.0% compared to 22.0% in Syracuse.
- Gadsden has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Syracuse.
- Syracuse has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Gadsden.
Demographics
Demographics Gadsden vs Syracuse provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gadsden | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 29 |
| White | 46 | 45 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gadsden vs Syracuse
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gadsden at 38% compared to 29% in Syracuse.
- Gadsden has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 45% in Syracuse.
- In Syracuse, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Gadsden.
- Syracuse has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 9% in Gadsden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Syracuse at 8%, compared to 5% in Gadsden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gadsden and Syracuse at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gadsden | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 26.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 43.6% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gadsden vs Syracuse
- More residents in Gadsden report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 20.3% in Syracuse.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Syracuse at 26.9% versus 24.6% in Gadsden.
- Syracuse has a higher smoking rate at 26.9% compared to 23.1% in Gadsden.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Syracuse at 14.0% compared to 13.4% in Gadsden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gadsden at 43.6% compared to 42.6% in Syracuse.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gadsden at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Syracuse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gadsden | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (240) | 1.8% (2,595) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (6,392) | 12.7% (18,391) |
| Less than High School | 19.0% (6,320) | 14.1% (20,347) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (3,602) | 18.5% (26,759) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gadsden vs Syracuse
- In Syracuse, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Gadsden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gadsden hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 12.7% in Syracuse.
- More residents in Gadsden have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 14.1% in Syracuse.
- In Syracuse, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 10.8% in Gadsden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.