Demographics details for Gadsden, AL vs Mukwonago, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gadsden, AL vs Mukwonago, WI.
| Data | Gadsden | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,335 | 8,446 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $39,696 | $91,827 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Gadsden vs Mukwonago
- In Gadsden, the population is higher at 33,335, compared to 8,446 in Mukwonago.
- The median age is the same in both Gadsden and Mukwonago at 39.7 years.
- Mukwonago has a higher median income of $91,827, compared to $39,696 in Gadsden.
- In Mukwonago, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 27.0% in Gadsden.
- Gadsden has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Mukwonago.
- The unemployment rate in Gadsden is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.4% in Mukwonago.
Demographics
Demographics Gadsden vs Mukwonago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gadsden | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gadsden vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gadsden at 38% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mukwonago at 82% compared to 46% in Gadsden.
- In Mukwonago, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Gadsden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gadsden at 9% compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukwonago at 7%, compared to 5% in Gadsden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gadsden at 1% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gadsden | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 25.2% |
| Obesity | 43.6% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gadsden vs Mukwonago
- More residents in Gadsden report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gadsden at 24.6% compared to 21.2% in Mukwonago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gadsden at 23.1% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 13.4% in Gadsden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gadsden at 43.6% compared to 35.3% in Mukwonago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gadsden at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukwonago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gadsden | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (240) | 0.6% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (6,392) | 17.0% (1,435) |
| Less than High School | 19.0% (6,320) | 4.7% (394) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (3,602) | 25.3% (2,138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gadsden vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of residents in Gadsden have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gadsden hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Mukwonago.
- More residents in Gadsden have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
- In Mukwonago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 10.8% in Gadsden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.