Demographics details for Fultondale, AL vs Sugar grove, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fultondale, AL vs Sugar grove, PA.
| Data | Fultondale | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,677 | 546 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $72,741 | $68,056 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fultondale vs Sugar grove
- In Fultondale, the population is higher at 9,677, compared to 546 in Sugar grove.
- The median age in Sugar grove is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 39.5 years in Fultondale.
- Fultondale has a higher median income of $72,741 compared to $68,056 in Sugar grove.
- In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fultondale.
- Fultondale has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fultondale.
Demographics
Demographics Fultondale vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fultondale | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 1 |
| White | 51 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fultondale vs Sugar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fultondale at 35% compared to 1% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 79% compared to 51% in Fultondale.
- The Asian population is larger in Fultondale at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fultondale at 9% compared to 6% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar grove at 14%, compared to 3% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fultondale and Sugar grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fultondale | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fultondale vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.8% in Fultondale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fultondale at 23.9% compared to 23.5% in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Sugar grove has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 36.4% in Fultondale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fultondale at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Sugar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fultondale | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (121) | 1.5% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (1,657) | 28.2% (154) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (1,005) | 6.2% (34) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (1,752) | 13.0% (71) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fultondale vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.3% in Fultondale.
- In Sugar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.2% compared to 17.1% in Fultondale.
- More residents in Fultondale have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 6.2% in Sugar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fultondale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 13.0% in Sugar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.