Demographics details for Fultondale, AL vs Sparks, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fultondale, AL vs Sparks, NV.
| Data | Fultondale | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,677 | 109,226 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,741 | $82,938 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fultondale vs Sparks
- The population in Sparks is higher at 109,226, compared to 9,677 in Fultondale.
- Residents in Fultondale have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 37.0 years in Sparks.
- Sparks has a higher median income of $82,938, compared to $72,741 in Fultondale.
- In Sparks, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fultondale.
- The poverty level is higher in Sparks at 10%, compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- Sparks has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Fultondale.
Demographics
Demographics Fultondale vs Sparks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fultondale | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 2 |
| White | 51 | 43 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fultondale vs Sparks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fultondale at 35% compared to 2% in Sparks.
- Fultondale has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 43% in Sparks.
- In Sparks, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Fultondale.
- Sparks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sparks at 15%, compared to 3% in Fultondale.
- In Sparks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fultondale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fultondale | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fultondale vs Sparks
- In Sparks, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.8% in Fultondale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fultondale at 23.9% compared to 19.9% in Sparks.
- Sparks has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sparks at 17.9% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fultondale at 36.4% compared to 28.6% in Sparks.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fultondale and Sparks at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fultondale | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (121) | 1.4% (1,548) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (1,657) | 14.7% (16,026) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (1,005) | 18.1% (19,717) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (1,752) | 16.9% (18,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fultondale vs Sparks
- In Sparks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.3% in Fultondale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fultondale hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Sparks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sparks at 18.1%, compared to 10.4% in Fultondale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fultondale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 16.9% in Sparks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.