Demographics details for Fultondale, AL vs Old bridge, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fultondale, AL vs Old bridge, NJ.
| Data | Fultondale | Old bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,677 | 28,094 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 43.2 years |
| Median Income | $72,741 | $104,712 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Fultondale vs Old bridge
- The population in Old bridge is higher at 28,094, compared to 9,677 in Fultondale.
- The median age in Old bridge is higher at 43.2 years, compared to 39.5 years in Fultondale.
- Old bridge has a higher median income of $104,712, compared to $72,741 in Fultondale.
- In Old bridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fultondale.
- Fultondale has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Old bridge.
- Old bridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Fultondale.
Demographics
Demographics Fultondale vs Old bridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fultondale | Old bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 4 |
| White | 51 | 61 |
| Asian | 2 | 13 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fultondale vs Old bridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fultondale at 35% compared to 4% in Old bridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Old bridge at 61% compared to 51% in Fultondale.
- In Old bridge, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 2% in Fultondale.
- Old bridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Old bridge at 6%, compared to 3% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fultondale and Old bridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fultondale | Old bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fultondale vs Old bridge
- More residents in Fultondale report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.3% in Old bridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fultondale at 23.9% compared to 19.8% in Old bridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fultondale at 16.4% compared to 11.4% in Old bridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fultondale at 16.4% compared to 16.2% in Old bridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fultondale at 36.4% compared to 28.5% in Old bridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fultondale at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Old bridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fultondale | Old bridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (121) | 1.1% (302) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (1,657) | 18.8% (5,278) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (1,005) | 8.2% (2,316) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (1,752) | 28.2% (7,918) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fultondale vs Old bridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Fultondale have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.1% in Old bridge.
- In Old bridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Fultondale.
- More residents in Fultondale have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 8.2% in Old bridge.
- In Old bridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.2% compared to 18.1% in Fultondale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.