Demographics details for Fultondale, AL vs Mansfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fultondale, AL vs Mansfield, OH.
Data | Fultondale | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,677 | 47,865 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $72,741 | $40,996 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.8 |
Population Comparison: Fultondale vs Mansfield
- The population in Mansfield is higher at 47,865, compared to 9,677 in Fultondale.
- Residents in Fultondale have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 38.9 years in Mansfield.
- Fultondale has a higher median income of $72,741 compared to $40,996 in Mansfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fultondale at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Mansfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Mansfield at 18%, compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- Mansfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.8% compared to 3.5% in Fultondale.
Demographics
Demographics Fultondale vs Mansfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fultondale | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 19 |
White | 51 | 69 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fultondale vs Mansfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fultondale at 35% compared to 19% in Mansfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mansfield at 69% compared to 51% in Fultondale.
- The Asian population is larger in Fultondale at 2% compared to 1% in Mansfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fultondale at 9% compared to 3% in Mansfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mansfield at 8%, compared to 3% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fultondale and Mansfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fultondale | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 14.9% |
Depression | 23.9% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 27.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 44.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fultondale vs Mansfield
- In Mansfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.8% in Fultondale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mansfield at 24.4% versus 23.9% in Fultondale.
- Mansfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.4% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mansfield at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Mansfield has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 36.4% in Fultondale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mansfield at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Fultondale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fultondale | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (121) | 1.0% (463) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (1,657) | 23.0% (11,014) |
Less than High School | 10.4% (1,005) | 15.7% (7,522) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (1,752) | 11.2% (5,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fultondale vs Mansfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Fultondale have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Mansfield.
- In Mansfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 17.1% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mansfield at 15.7%, compared to 10.4% in Fultondale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fultondale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 11.2% in Mansfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.