Demographics details for Fultondale, AL vs Crescent, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fultondale, AL vs Crescent, PA.
Data | Fultondale | Crescent |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,677 | 2,455 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 50.8 years |
Median Income | $72,741 | $76,116 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fultondale vs Crescent
- In Fultondale, the population is higher at 9,677, compared to 2,455 in Crescent.
- The median age in Crescent is higher at 50.8 years, compared to 39.5 years in Fultondale.
- Crescent has a higher median income of $76,116, compared to $72,741 in Fultondale.
- In Crescent, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fultondale.
- Fultondale has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 4% in Crescent.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fultondale and Crescent at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Fultondale vs Crescent provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fultondale | Crescent |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 1 |
White | 51 | 92 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fultondale vs Crescent
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fultondale at 35% compared to 1% in Crescent.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crescent at 92% compared to 51% in Fultondale.
- In Crescent, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Fultondale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fultondale at 9% compared to 3% in Crescent.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fultondale at 3% compared to 1% in Crescent.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fultondale and Crescent at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fultondale | Crescent |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 23.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 36.4% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fultondale vs Crescent
- More residents in Fultondale report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fultondale at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fultondale at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fultondale at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fultondale at 36.4% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fultondale and Crescent at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fultondale | Crescent |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (121) | 1.1% (27) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (1,657) | 18.3% (449) |
Less than High School | 10.4% (1,005) | 10.8% (264) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (1,752) | 19.8% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fultondale vs Crescent
- A higher percentage of residents in Fultondale have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.1% in Crescent.
- In Crescent, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crescent at 10.8%, compared to 10.4% in Fultondale.
- In Crescent, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Fultondale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.