Demographics details for Fulton, MO vs Little suamico, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fulton, MO vs Little suamico, WI.

Data Fulton Little suamico
Population 12,710 4,878
Median Age 33.9 years 41.0 years
Median Income $59,544 $74,800
Married Families 29.0% 56.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Fulton vs Little suamico

  • In Fulton, the population is higher at 12,710, compared to 4,878 in Little suamico.
  • The median age in Little suamico is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 33.9 years in Fulton.
  • Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800, compared to $59,544 in Fulton.
  • In Little suamico, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 29.0% in Fulton.
  • Fulton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Little suamico.
  • The unemployment rate in Fulton is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.

Demographics

Demographics Fulton vs Little suamico provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fulton Little suamico
Black 9 1
White 86 95
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 2 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fulton vs Little suamico

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fulton at 9% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little suamico at 95% compared to 86% in Fulton.
  • In Little suamico, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fulton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fulton at 3% compared to 2% in Little suamico.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fulton at 2% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fulton and Little suamico at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fulton Little suamico
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.9% Data is updating%
Depression 24.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 24.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fulton vs Little suamico

  • More residents in Fulton report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fulton at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fulton at 24.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fulton at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fulton at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fulton at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fulton Little suamico
No Schooling 0.0% (3) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.3% (2,077) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 16.9% (2,154) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.7% (1,867) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Fulton vs Little suamico

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fulton and Little suamico at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fulton hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • More residents in Fulton have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fulton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.