Demographics details for Fullerton, CA vs Park ridge, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fullerton, CA vs Park ridge, NJ.
| Data | Fullerton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 140,541 | 9,426 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 47.8 years |
| Median Income | $99,279 | $164,241 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fullerton vs Park ridge
- In Fullerton, the population is higher at 140,541, compared to 9,426 in Park ridge.
- The median age in Park ridge is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 35.5 years in Fullerton.
- Park ridge has a higher median income of $164,241, compared to $99,279 in Fullerton.
- In Park ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 40.0% in Fullerton.
- Fullerton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Park ridge.
- Park ridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in Fullerton.
Demographics
Demographics Fullerton vs Park ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fullerton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 22 | 77 |
| Asian | 25 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 38 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fullerton vs Park ridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fullerton at 2% compared to 1% in Park ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Park ridge at 77% compared to 22% in Fullerton.
- The Asian population is larger in Fullerton at 25% compared to 4% in Park ridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fullerton at 38% compared to 13% in Park ridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fullerton at 12% compared to 5% in Park ridge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fullerton at 1% compared to 0% in Park ridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fullerton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 10.1% | 10.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 25.7% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fullerton vs Park ridge
- More residents in Fullerton report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.1% in Park ridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Park ridge at 17.8% versus 16.8% in Fullerton.
- Park ridge has a higher smoking rate at 10.2% compared to 10.1% in Fullerton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Park ridge at 18.7% compared to 15.5% in Fullerton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fullerton at 25.7% compared to 24.6% in Park ridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fullerton at 9.0% compared to 5.0% in Park ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fullerton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (2,259) | 0.3% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (13,991) | 12.4% (1,169) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (18,547) | 5.8% (549) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.7% (41,772) | 37.8% (3,565) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fullerton vs Park ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Fullerton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Park ridge.
- In Park ridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.4% compared to 10.0% in Fullerton.
- More residents in Fullerton have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 5.8% in Park ridge.
- In Park ridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.8% compared to 29.7% in Fullerton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.