Demographics details for Frisco, TX vs Oak harbor, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frisco, TX vs Oak harbor, WA.
| Data | Frisco | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219,587 | 24,403 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $144,567 | $68,039 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Frisco vs Oak harbor
- In Frisco, the population is higher at 219,587, compared to 24,403 in Oak harbor.
- Residents in Frisco have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 31.7 years in Oak harbor.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567 compared to $68,039 in Oak harbor.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Frisco at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Oak harbor.
- The poverty level is higher in Oak harbor at 7%, compared to 3% in Frisco.
- Oak harbor has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Frisco vs Oak harbor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frisco | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 5 |
| White | 49 | 56 |
| Asian | 23 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Frisco vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Frisco at 8% compared to 5% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oak harbor at 56% compared to 49% in Frisco.
- The Asian population is larger in Frisco at 23% compared to 8% in Oak harbor.
- Oak harbor has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 12% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oak harbor at 14%, compared to 8% in Frisco.
- In Oak harbor, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Frisco.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frisco | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frisco vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oak harbor at 25.0% versus 20.8% in Frisco.
- Oak harbor has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 16.2% in Oak harbor.
- Oak harbor has higher obesity rates at 31.5% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oak harbor at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frisco | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1,358) | 0.4% (106) |
| High School Diploma | 5.0% (11,084) | 12.8% (3,133) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (7,431) | 5.7% (1,395) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (85,346) | 17.6% (4,288) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frisco vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oak harbor at 5.7%, compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 17.6% in Oak harbor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.