Demographics details for Frisco, TX vs Maricopa, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frisco, TX vs Maricopa, AZ.
Data | Frisco | Maricopa |
---|---|---|
Population | 219,587 | 66,290 |
Median Age | 37.8 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $144,567 | $88,795 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 3% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Frisco vs Maricopa
- In Frisco, the population is higher at 219,587, compared to 66,290 in Maricopa.
- Residents in Frisco have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 35.7 years in Maricopa.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567 compared to $88,795 in Maricopa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Frisco at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Maricopa.
- The poverty level is higher in Maricopa at 10%, compared to 3% in Frisco.
- Maricopa has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Frisco vs Maricopa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Frisco | Maricopa |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 11 |
White | 49 | 42 |
Asian | 23 | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Frisco vs Maricopa
- In Maricopa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 8% in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 42% in Maricopa.
- The Asian population is larger in Frisco at 23% compared to 2% in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 12% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maricopa at 14%, compared to 8% in Frisco.
- In Maricopa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Frisco.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Frisco | Maricopa |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 10.8% |
Depression | 20.8% | 18.6% |
Smoking | 9.6% | 15.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 27.4% | 35.4% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frisco vs Maricopa
- In Maricopa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frisco at 20.8% compared to 18.6% in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Frisco and Maricopa at 18.4%.
- Maricopa has higher obesity rates at 35.4% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maricopa at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Frisco | Maricopa |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1,358) | 0.4% (254) |
High School Diploma | 5.0% (11,084) | 15.3% (10,156) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (7,431) | 8.2% (5,413) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (85,346) | 13.4% (8,850) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frisco vs Maricopa
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Maricopa.
- In Maricopa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Maricopa at 8.2%, compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 13.4% in Maricopa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.