Demographics details for Frisco, TX vs Lakeland, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frisco, TX vs Lakeland, FL.
| Data | Frisco | Lakeland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219,587 | 120,071 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $144,567 | $58,290 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Frisco vs Lakeland
- In Frisco, the population is higher at 219,587, compared to 120,071 in Lakeland.
- The median age in Lakeland is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 37.8 years in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567 compared to $58,290 in Lakeland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Frisco at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Lakeland.
- The poverty level is higher in Lakeland at 14%, compared to 3% in Frisco.
- Lakeland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Frisco vs Lakeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frisco | Lakeland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 19 |
| White | 49 | 56 |
| Asian | 23 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Frisco vs Lakeland
- In Lakeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 8% in Frisco.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lakeland at 56% compared to 49% in Frisco.
- The Asian population is larger in Frisco at 23% compared to 2% in Lakeland.
- Lakeland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 12% in Frisco.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Frisco at 8% compared to 6% in Lakeland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Frisco and Lakeland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frisco | Lakeland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frisco vs Lakeland
- In Lakeland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frisco at 20.8% compared to 20.2% in Lakeland.
- Lakeland has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 15.2% in Lakeland.
- Lakeland has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lakeland at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frisco | Lakeland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1,358) | 0.9% (1,125) |
| High School Diploma | 5.0% (11,084) | 18.8% (22,520) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (7,431) | 10.9% (13,131) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (85,346) | 17.7% (21,245) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frisco vs Lakeland
- In Lakeland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Frisco.
- In Lakeland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lakeland at 10.9%, compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 17.7% in Lakeland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.