Demographics details for Frisco, TX vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frisco, TX vs Fairmont, NC.
| Data | Frisco | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219,587 | 2,188 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $144,567 | $31,731 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Frisco vs Fairmont
- In Frisco, the population is higher at 219,587, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 37.8 years in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Frisco at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 3% in Frisco.
- Fairmont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Frisco vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frisco | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 62 |
| White | 49 | 14 |
| Asian | 23 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Frisco vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 8% in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Frisco at 23% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Frisco at 12% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Frisco at 8% compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Frisco.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frisco | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 47.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frisco vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairmont at 22.6% versus 20.8% in Frisco.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frisco | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1,358) | 0.3% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 5.0% (11,084) | 27.5% (602) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (7,431) | 12.9% (282) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (85,346) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frisco vs Fairmont
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairmont at 12.9%, compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.