Demographics details for Frisco, TX vs Carrollton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frisco, TX vs Carrollton, GA.
| Data | Frisco | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219,587 | 27,262 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 27.5 years |
| Median Income | $144,567 | $46,722 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Frisco vs Carrollton
- In Frisco, the population is higher at 219,587, compared to 27,262 in Carrollton.
- Residents in Frisco have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 27.5 years in Carrollton.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567 compared to $46,722 in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Frisco at 44.0% compared to 27.0% in Carrollton.
- The poverty level is higher in Carrollton at 15%, compared to 3% in Frisco.
- Carrollton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Frisco vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frisco | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 36 |
| White | 49 | 47 |
| Asian | 23 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Frisco vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 8% in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 47% in Carrollton.
- The Asian population is larger in Frisco at 23% compared to 1% in Carrollton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Frisco at 12% compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Frisco at 8% compared to 5% in Carrollton.
- In Carrollton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Frisco.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frisco | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frisco vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carrollton at 20.9% versus 20.8% in Frisco.
- Carrollton has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 14.7% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carrollton at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frisco | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1,358) | 0.8% (212) |
| High School Diploma | 5.0% (11,084) | 12.6% (3,426) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (7,431) | 11.5% (3,126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (85,346) | 16.9% (4,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frisco vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Frisco.
- In Carrollton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrollton at 11.5%, compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.9% in Carrollton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.