Demographics details for Frisco, TX vs Buckner, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frisco, TX vs Buckner, KY.
| Data | Frisco | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219,587 | 3,658 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $144,567 | $141,538 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Frisco vs Buckner
- In Frisco, the population is higher at 219,587, compared to 3,658 in Buckner.
- Residents in Frisco have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 37.6 years in Buckner.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567 compared to $141,538 in Buckner.
- In Buckner, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 44.0% in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher poverty level at 3% compared to 0% in Buckner.
- The unemployment rate in Frisco is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Buckner.
Demographics
Demographics Frisco vs Buckner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frisco | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 6 |
| White | 49 | 84 |
| Asian | 23 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Frisco vs Buckner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Frisco at 8% compared to 6% in Buckner.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Buckner at 84% compared to 49% in Frisco.
- The Asian population is larger in Frisco at 23% compared to 0% in Buckner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Frisco at 12% compared to 4% in Buckner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Frisco at 8% compared to 6% in Buckner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Frisco and Buckner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frisco | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 33.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frisco vs Buckner
- In Buckner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Buckner at 21.0% versus 20.8% in Frisco.
- Buckner has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Buckner at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Frisco.
- Buckner has higher obesity rates at 33.8% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- Disability percentages are higher in Frisco at 6.0% compared to 5.0% in Buckner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frisco | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1,358) | 0.6% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 5.0% (11,084) | 3.3% (121) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (7,431) | 8.7% (320) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (85,346) | 36.6% (1,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frisco vs Buckner
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Frisco and Buckner at 0.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco hold a high school diploma at 5.0% compared to 3.3% in Buckner.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Buckner at 8.7%, compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 36.6% in Buckner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.