Demographics details for Frisco, TX vs Alameda, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frisco, TX vs Alameda, CA.
| Data | Frisco | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219,587 | 76,040 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $144,567 | $129,917 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Frisco vs Alameda
- In Frisco, the population is higher at 219,587, compared to 76,040 in Alameda.
- The median age in Alameda is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 37.8 years in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567 compared to $129,917 in Alameda.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Frisco and Alameda at 44.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Alameda at 7%, compared to 3% in Frisco.
- Alameda has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Frisco vs Alameda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frisco | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 7 |
| White | 49 | 37 |
| Asian | 23 | 32 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Frisco vs Alameda
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Frisco at 8% compared to 7% in Alameda.
- Frisco has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 37% in Alameda.
- In Alameda, the Asian population stands at 32%, greater than 23% in Frisco.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Frisco and Alameda at 12%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alameda at 12%, compared to 8% in Frisco.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Frisco and Alameda at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frisco | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 8.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 27.4% | 23.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frisco vs Alameda
- In Alameda, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.0% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frisco at 20.8% compared to 17.2% in Alameda.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Frisco at 9.6% compared to 8.9% in Alameda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 15.5% in Alameda.
- Obesity rates are higher in Frisco at 27.4% compared to 23.5% in Alameda.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alameda at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frisco | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1,358) | 1.1% (864) |
| High School Diploma | 5.0% (11,084) | 7.0% (5,348) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (7,431) | 6.8% (5,184) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (85,346) | 44.5% (33,855) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frisco vs Alameda
- In Alameda, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Frisco.
- In Alameda, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alameda at 6.8%, compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- In Alameda, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.5% compared to 38.9% in Frisco.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.