Demographics details for Friona, TX vs Little falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friona, TX vs Little falls, MN.
| Data | Friona | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,053 | 9,094 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,837 | $44,455 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Friona vs Little falls
- The population in Little falls is higher at 9,094, compared to 4,053 in Friona.
- The median age in Little falls is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 37.7 years in Friona.
- Friona has a higher median income of $67,837 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Friona at 51.0% compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
- Friona has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Little falls.
- Little falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Friona.
Demographics
Demographics Friona vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Friona | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 4 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 74 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Friona vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Friona at 1% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 4% in Friona.
- In Little falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Friona.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Friona at 74% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Friona at 19% compared to 3% in Little falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Friona at 2% compared to 0% in Little falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Friona | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friona vs Little falls
- More residents in Friona report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 21.4% in Friona.
- Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.3% in Friona.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 16.5% in Friona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Friona at 40.2% compared to 38.5% in Little falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Friona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Friona | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.7% (232) | 0.7% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (543) | 25.4% (2,308) |
| Less than High School | 43.8% (1,777) | 11.7% (1,063) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.4% (342) | 14.3% (1,301) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friona vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Friona have no formal schooling at 5.7% compared to 0.7% in Little falls.
- In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 13.4% in Friona.
- More residents in Friona have less than a high school education at 43.8% compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
- In Little falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 8.4% in Friona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.