Demographics details for Friona, TX vs Convent, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friona, TX vs Convent, LA.
| Data | Friona | Convent |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,053 | 552 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 24.2 years |
| Median Income | $67,837 | $41,042 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 16.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Friona vs Convent
- In Friona, the population is higher at 4,053, compared to 552 in Convent.
- Residents in Friona have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 24.2 years in Convent.
- Friona has a higher median income of $67,837 compared to $41,042 in Convent.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Friona at 51.0% compared to 16.0% in Convent.
- The poverty level is identical in both Friona and Convent at 15%.
- Convent has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Friona.
Demographics
Demographics Friona vs Convent provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Friona | Convent |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 74 |
| White | 4 | 26 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 74 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 19 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Friona vs Convent
- In Convent, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 1% in Friona.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Convent at 26% compared to 4% in Friona.
- Both Friona and Convent have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Friona at 74% compared to 0% in Convent.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Friona at 19% compared to 0% in Convent.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Friona at 2% compared to 0% in Convent.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Friona | Convent |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friona vs Convent
- In Convent, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.1% in Friona.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Convent at 23.4% versus 21.4% in Friona.
- Convent has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 17.3% in Friona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Friona at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Convent.
- Convent has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 40.2% in Friona.
- Disability percentages are higher in Friona at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Convent.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Friona | Convent |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.7% (232) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (543) | 17.9% (99) |
| Less than High School | 43.8% (1,777) | 6.7% (37) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.4% (342) | 8.9% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friona vs Convent
- A higher percentage of residents in Friona have no formal schooling at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Convent.
- In Convent, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 13.4% in Friona.
- More residents in Friona have less than a high school education at 43.8% compared to 6.7% in Convent.
- In Convent, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.9% compared to 8.4% in Friona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.