Demographics details for Friendship, WI vs Whiting, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friendship, WI vs Whiting, KS.
| Data | Friendship | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 681 | 195 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $45,208 | $52,000 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Friendship vs Whiting
- In Friendship, the population is higher at 681, compared to 195 in Whiting.
- Residents in Friendship have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 33.7 years in Whiting.
- Whiting has a higher median income of $52,000, compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- In Whiting, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The unemployment rate in Friendship is higher at 4.5%, compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
Demographics
Demographics Friendship vs Whiting provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Friendship | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 84 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Friendship vs Whiting
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Friendship at 5% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whiting at 87% compared to 84% in Friendship.
- Both Friendship and Whiting have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Whiting has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whiting at 11%, compared to 9% in Friendship.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Friendship at 1% compared to 0% in Whiting.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Friendship | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friendship vs Whiting
- More residents in Friendship report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.1% in Whiting.
- Depression is more prevalent in Friendship at 24.3% compared to 22.9% in Whiting.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Friendship at 21.6% compared to 17.9% in Whiting.
- Binge drinking is more common in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 19.3% in Whiting.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 39.3%.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Friendship and Whiting at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Friendship | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (183) | 28.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (177) | 9.2% (18) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.2% (22) | 14.9% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friendship vs Whiting
- A higher percentage of residents in Friendship have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
- In Whiting, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 26.9% in Friendship.
- More residents in Friendship have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 9.2% in Whiting.
- In Whiting, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.